The Palestinians are not as nice as the Tibetans in the eyes of the world. But the Palestinian people deserve exactly the same rights as the occupied Tibetan people, even if their leaders are less enchanting, they have no scarlet robes and their fight is more violent. There is absolutely no connection between rights and the means of protest, and from that perspective, there is no difference between a Tibetan and a Palestinian - they both deserve the exact same freedom.
Moreover, in the first years of the Israeli occupation, most Palestinians accepted it submissively, with practically no violence. What did they get as a result? Nothing. The world and Israel cloaked themselves in apathy and callousness. Only when planes started being hijacked in the 1970s did the world begin to notice that a Palestinian problem even existed. In contrast, the Tibetan struggle also was tainted with violence in the past, and it is reasonable to assume that violence will increase if the Tibetans do not attain their goal.[...]
Nowhere in the world today is there a region more besieged and confined than Gaza. And what is the result? The world calls to boycott the occupier in the case of China, while absurdly, with regard to the Palestinians, the world is boycotting the occupied entity, or at least its elected leadership, and not the occupier. This, it seems, has no parallel in history.
Internationally speaking, the situation of the Palestinians is ostensibly better, since while all governments recognize Chinese sovereignty over Tibet, no government in the world recognizes Israeli sovereignty over the Palestinian territories. Practically speaking, this does not help the Palestinians much: Contemporary bon ton is to support the struggle for Tibet, only Tibet. The Palestinians have not even one Richard Gere to serve as a mouthpiece. German Chancellor Angela Merkel is boycotting the Olympic games but paid an official visit to Israel, where she spoke not one word about the shameful conditions in Gaza under Israeli occupation. Is there any other way to describe this, except a double standard?
Zdroj: Gideon Levy: Palestinians versus Tibetans - a double standard, Haaretz.com
Myslím, že by Palestincům prospělo, kdyby od terrorismu přestoupili na nenásilné formy protestu.
OdpovědětVymazatCo kdyby presli na Judaismus?
OdpovědětVymazatA co kdyby si založili v USA silnou lobby, jako protějšek AIPAC?
OdpovědětVymazatKdyž by přešli na judaism, tak by ztratili identitu.
OdpovědětVymazatZaložit si druhý AIPAC se nikomu nepovede. O to se snaží všichni, ale nemají sebemenší chanci.
"Když by přešli na judaism, tak by ztratili identitu."
OdpovědětVymazatCo kdyby zide odhodili judaismus a stali pouze obcany statu, kde ziji?
Zanikl by antisemitismus?